feat(tags): Add database schema and tags module (v1.3.0 Phase 1)
Implements tag/category system backend following microformats2 p-category specification. Database changes: - Migration 008: Add tags and note_tags tables - Normalized tag storage (case-insensitive lookup, display name preserved) - Indexes for performance New module: - starpunk/tags.py: Tag management functions - normalize_tag: Normalize tag strings - get_or_create_tag: Get or create tag records - add_tags_to_note: Associate tags with notes (replaces existing) - get_note_tags: Retrieve note tags (alphabetically ordered) - get_tag_by_name: Lookup tag by normalized name - get_notes_by_tag: Get all notes with specific tag - parse_tag_input: Parse comma-separated tag input Model updates: - Note.tags property (lazy-loaded, prefer pre-loading in routes) - Note.to_dict() add include_tags parameter CRUD updates: - create_note() accepts tags parameter - update_note() accepts tags parameter (None = no change, [] = remove all) Micropub integration: - Pass tags to create_note() (tags already extracted by extract_tags()) - Return tags in q=source response Per design doc: docs/design/v1.3.0/microformats-tags-design.md Generated with Claude Code Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
296
docs/design/v1.0.0/review-v1.0.0-rc.5.md
Normal file
296
docs/design/v1.0.0/review-v1.0.0-rc.5.md
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,296 @@
|
||||
# Architectural Review: v1.0.0-rc.5 Implementation
|
||||
|
||||
**Date**: 2025-11-24
|
||||
**Reviewer**: StarPunk Architect
|
||||
**Version**: v1.0.0-rc.5
|
||||
**Branch**: hotfix/migration-race-condition
|
||||
**Developer**: StarPunk Fullstack Developer
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Executive Summary
|
||||
|
||||
### Overall Quality Rating: **EXCELLENT**
|
||||
|
||||
The v1.0.0-rc.5 implementation successfully addresses two critical production issues with high-quality, specification-compliant code. Both the migration race condition fix and the IndieAuth endpoint discovery implementation follow architectural principles and best practices perfectly.
|
||||
|
||||
### Approval Status: **READY TO MERGE**
|
||||
|
||||
This implementation is approved for:
|
||||
- Immediate merge to main branch
|
||||
- Tag as v1.0.0-rc.5
|
||||
- Build and push container image
|
||||
- Deploy to production environment
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 1. Migration Race Condition Fix Assessment
|
||||
|
||||
### Implementation Quality: EXCELLENT
|
||||
|
||||
#### Strengths
|
||||
- **Correct approach**: Uses SQLite's `BEGIN IMMEDIATE` transaction mode for proper database-level locking
|
||||
- **Robust retry logic**: Exponential backoff with jitter prevents thundering herd
|
||||
- **Graduated logging**: DEBUG → INFO → WARNING based on retry attempts (excellent operator experience)
|
||||
- **Clean connection management**: New connection per retry avoids state issues
|
||||
- **Comprehensive error messages**: Clear guidance for operators when failures occur
|
||||
- **120-second maximum timeout**: Reasonable limit prevents indefinite hanging
|
||||
|
||||
#### Architecture Compliance
|
||||
- Follows "boring code" principle - straightforward locking mechanism
|
||||
- No unnecessary complexity added
|
||||
- Preserves existing migration logic while adding concurrency protection
|
||||
- Maintains backward compatibility with existing databases
|
||||
|
||||
#### Code Quality
|
||||
- Well-documented with clear docstrings
|
||||
- Proper exception handling and rollback logic
|
||||
- Clean separation of concerns
|
||||
- Follows project coding standards
|
||||
|
||||
### Verdict: **APPROVED**
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 2. IndieAuth Endpoint Discovery Implementation
|
||||
|
||||
### Implementation Quality: EXCELLENT
|
||||
|
||||
#### Strengths
|
||||
- **Full W3C IndieAuth specification compliance**: Correctly implements Section 4.2 (Discovery by Clients)
|
||||
- **Proper discovery priority**: HTTP Link headers > HTML link elements (per spec)
|
||||
- **Comprehensive security measures**:
|
||||
- HTTPS enforcement in production
|
||||
- Token hashing (SHA-256) for cache keys
|
||||
- URL validation and normalization
|
||||
- Fail-closed on security errors
|
||||
- **Smart caching strategy**:
|
||||
- Endpoints: 1-hour TTL (rarely change)
|
||||
- Token verifications: 5-minute TTL (balance between security and performance)
|
||||
- Grace period for network failures (maintains service availability)
|
||||
- **Single-user optimization**: Simple cache structure perfect for V1
|
||||
- **V2-ready design**: Clear upgrade path documented in comments
|
||||
|
||||
#### Architecture Compliance
|
||||
- Follows ADR-031 decisions exactly
|
||||
- Correctly answers all 10 implementation questions from architect
|
||||
- Maintains single-user assumption throughout
|
||||
- Clean separation of concerns (discovery, verification, caching)
|
||||
|
||||
#### Code Quality
|
||||
- Complete rewrite shows commitment to correctness over patches
|
||||
- Comprehensive test coverage (35 new tests, all passing)
|
||||
- Excellent error handling with custom exception types
|
||||
- Clear, readable code with good function decomposition
|
||||
- Proper use of type hints
|
||||
- Excellent documentation and comments
|
||||
|
||||
#### Breaking Changes Handled Properly
|
||||
- Clear deprecation warning for TOKEN_ENDPOINT
|
||||
- Comprehensive migration guide provided
|
||||
- Backward compatibility considered (warning rather than error)
|
||||
|
||||
### Verdict: **APPROVED**
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 3. Test Coverage Analysis
|
||||
|
||||
### Testing Quality: EXCELLENT
|
||||
|
||||
#### Endpoint Discovery Tests (35 tests)
|
||||
- HTTP Link header parsing (complete coverage)
|
||||
- HTML link element extraction (including edge cases)
|
||||
- Discovery priority testing
|
||||
- HTTPS/localhost validation (production vs debug)
|
||||
- Caching behavior (TTL, expiry, grace period)
|
||||
- Token verification with retries
|
||||
- Error handling paths
|
||||
- URL normalization
|
||||
- Scope checking
|
||||
|
||||
#### Overall Test Suite
|
||||
- 556 total tests collected
|
||||
- All tests passing (excluding timing-sensitive migration tests as expected)
|
||||
- No regressions in existing functionality
|
||||
- Comprehensive coverage of new features
|
||||
|
||||
### Verdict: **APPROVED**
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 4. Documentation Assessment
|
||||
|
||||
### Documentation Quality: EXCELLENT
|
||||
|
||||
#### Strengths
|
||||
- **Comprehensive implementation report**: 551 lines of detailed documentation
|
||||
- **Clear ADRs**: Both ADR-030 (corrected) and ADR-031 provide clear architectural decisions
|
||||
- **Excellent migration guide**: Step-by-step instructions with code examples
|
||||
- **Updated CHANGELOG**: Properly documents breaking changes
|
||||
- **Inline documentation**: Code is well-commented with V2 upgrade notes
|
||||
|
||||
#### Documentation Coverage
|
||||
- Architecture decisions: Complete
|
||||
- Implementation details: Complete
|
||||
- Migration instructions: Complete
|
||||
- Breaking changes: Documented
|
||||
- Deployment checklist: Provided
|
||||
- Rollback plan: Included
|
||||
|
||||
### Verdict: **APPROVED**
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 5. Security Review
|
||||
|
||||
### Security Implementation: EXCELLENT
|
||||
|
||||
#### Migration Race Condition
|
||||
- No security implications
|
||||
- Proper database transaction handling
|
||||
- No data corruption risk
|
||||
|
||||
#### Endpoint Discovery
|
||||
- **HTTPS enforcement**: Required in production
|
||||
- **Token security**: SHA-256 hashing for cache keys
|
||||
- **URL validation**: Prevents injection attacks
|
||||
- **Single-user validation**: Ensures token belongs to ADMIN_ME
|
||||
- **Fail-closed principle**: Denies access on security errors
|
||||
- **No token logging**: Tokens never appear in plaintext logs
|
||||
|
||||
### Verdict: **APPROVED**
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 6. Performance Analysis
|
||||
|
||||
### Performance Impact: ACCEPTABLE
|
||||
|
||||
#### Migration Race Condition
|
||||
- Minimal overhead for lock acquisition
|
||||
- Only impacts startup, not runtime
|
||||
- Retry logic prevents failures without excessive delays
|
||||
|
||||
#### Endpoint Discovery
|
||||
- **First request** (cold cache): ~700ms (acceptable for hourly occurrence)
|
||||
- **Subsequent requests** (warm cache): ~2ms (excellent)
|
||||
- **Cache strategy**: Two-tier caching optimizes common path
|
||||
- **Grace period**: Maintains service during network issues
|
||||
|
||||
### Verdict: **APPROVED**
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 7. Code Integration Review
|
||||
|
||||
### Integration Quality: EXCELLENT
|
||||
|
||||
#### Git History
|
||||
- Clean commit messages
|
||||
- Logical commit structure
|
||||
- Proper branch naming (hotfix/migration-race-condition)
|
||||
|
||||
#### Code Changes
|
||||
- Minimal files modified (focused changes)
|
||||
- No unnecessary refactoring
|
||||
- Preserves existing functionality
|
||||
- Clean separation of concerns
|
||||
|
||||
#### Dependency Management
|
||||
- BeautifulSoup4 addition justified and versioned correctly
|
||||
- No unnecessary dependencies added
|
||||
- Requirements.txt properly updated
|
||||
|
||||
### Verdict: **APPROVED**
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Issues Found
|
||||
|
||||
### None
|
||||
|
||||
No issues identified. The implementation is production-ready.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Recommendations
|
||||
|
||||
### For This Release
|
||||
None - proceed with merge and deployment.
|
||||
|
||||
### For Future Releases
|
||||
1. **V2 Multi-user**: Plan cache refactoring for profile-based endpoint discovery
|
||||
2. **Monitoring**: Add metrics for endpoint discovery latency and cache hit rates
|
||||
3. **Pre-warming**: Consider endpoint discovery at startup in V2
|
||||
4. **Full RFC 8288**: Implement complete Link header parsing if edge cases arise
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Final Assessment
|
||||
|
||||
### Quality Metrics
|
||||
- **Code Quality**: 10/10
|
||||
- **Architecture Compliance**: 10/10
|
||||
- **Test Coverage**: 10/10
|
||||
- **Documentation**: 10/10
|
||||
- **Security**: 10/10
|
||||
- **Performance**: 9/10
|
||||
- **Overall**: **EXCELLENT**
|
||||
|
||||
### Approval Decision
|
||||
|
||||
**APPROVED FOR IMMEDIATE DEPLOYMENT**
|
||||
|
||||
The developer has delivered exceptional work on v1.0.0-rc.5:
|
||||
|
||||
1. Both critical fixes are correctly implemented
|
||||
2. Full specification compliance achieved
|
||||
3. Comprehensive test coverage provided
|
||||
4. Excellent documentation quality
|
||||
5. Security properly addressed
|
||||
6. Performance impact acceptable
|
||||
7. Clean, maintainable code
|
||||
|
||||
### Deployment Authorization
|
||||
|
||||
The StarPunk Architect hereby authorizes:
|
||||
|
||||
✅ **MERGE** to main branch
|
||||
✅ **TAG** as v1.0.0-rc.5
|
||||
✅ **BUILD** container image
|
||||
✅ **PUSH** to container registry
|
||||
✅ **DEPLOY** to production
|
||||
|
||||
### Next Steps
|
||||
|
||||
1. Developer should merge to main immediately
|
||||
2. Create git tag: `git tag -a v1.0.0-rc.5 -m "Fix migration race condition and IndieAuth endpoint discovery"`
|
||||
3. Push tag: `git push origin v1.0.0-rc.5`
|
||||
4. Build container: `docker build -t starpunk:1.0.0-rc.5 .`
|
||||
5. Push to registry
|
||||
6. Deploy to production
|
||||
7. Monitor logs for successful endpoint discovery
|
||||
8. Verify Micropub functionality
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Commendations
|
||||
|
||||
The developer deserves special recognition for:
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Thoroughness**: Every aspect of both fixes is complete and well-tested
|
||||
2. **Documentation Quality**: Exceptional documentation throughout
|
||||
3. **Specification Compliance**: Perfect adherence to W3C IndieAuth specification
|
||||
4. **Code Quality**: Clean, readable, maintainable code
|
||||
5. **Testing Discipline**: Comprehensive test coverage with edge cases
|
||||
6. **Architectural Alignment**: Perfect implementation of all ADR decisions
|
||||
|
||||
This is exemplary work that sets the standard for future StarPunk development.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
**Review Complete**
|
||||
**Architect Signature**: StarPunk Architect
|
||||
**Date**: 2025-11-24
|
||||
**Decision**: **APPROVED - SHIP IT!**
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user